Strategic Analysis Of U.S. Special Operations During The Korean Conflict

Brief Summary

Strategic Analysis Of U.S. Special Operations During The Korean Conflict by Major Steve A. Fondacaro provides a detailed examination of the strategic effectiveness of special operations executed by the Far East Command (FECOM) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) during the Korean Conflict from 1950 to 1953. The book meticulously evaluates the impact and efficiency of these operations concerning strategy, organization, and operations as outlined in the Joint Chiefs of Staff Publication Number 2, Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF). The study probes into the evolving strategic objectives of the United Nations Command in the Korean theater and examines how these objectives influenced the development of special operations.

Main Themes and Topics

The major themes explored in Fondacaro's work include the strategic objectives of U.S. special operations, the effectiveness of these operations in achieving overarching military goals, and the challenges encountered due to bureaucratic conflicts between FECOM and CIA. The book delves into the intricacies of partisan operations involving anti-communist North Koreans and the evolution of psychological operations that expanded significantly throughout the conflict. It also highlights the CIA's autonomous role in intelligence gathering and covert activities, a factor that contributed to tension and coordination issues between involved entities.

Writing Style and Tone

Major Steve A. Fondacaro adopts an analytical and factual writing style throughout the book, emphasizing systematic evaluation and historical accuracy. His tone is scholarly and objective, aiming to provide a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of U.S. special operations during the Korean War. The use of military terminology and detailed explanations reflects the book's target audience of military scholars and professionals interested in strategic military analysis.

Criticism

One area of criticism for the book may revolve around its dense and technical nature, which could prove challenging for readers without a military background or familiarity with the specific jargon used within military strategic circles. Additionally, some readers may find the book's focus on bureaucratic conflicts and detailed organizational analysis as detracting from the more action-oriented aspects of military operations.