The Last Big-gun Naval Battle

Brief Summary

"The Last Big-gun Naval Battle" by Howard Sauer delves into the intricacies of the Battle of Leyte Gulf, focusing specifically on the Surigao Strait action, renowned as the United States Navy's greatest triumph. Sauer provides a detailed, eye-witness account from a unique perspective, shedding light on the strategic execution and coordination that made this battle a pivotal moment in naval history.

Main Themes and Topics

The central theme of "The Last Big-gun Naval Battle" is the mastery of naval strategy during one of history's most significant confrontations at sea. Sauer vividly captures the complex interplay of timing and execution that led to the successful "Crossing of the 'T'" tactic used by the U.S. Navy. The narrative emphasizes the importance of tactical innovation and cooperation among naval forces, illustrating how these elements contributed to the decisive success at Surigao Strait. Additionally, the book provides a nuanced understanding of naval warfare during World War II, highlighting the human experiences and challenges faced by those aboard the ships.

Writing Style and Tone

Howard Sauer’s writing style is both engaging and detailed, effectively immersing readers in the heart of naval warfare. His tone is authoritative yet accessible, making complex naval maneuvers and strategies understandable to both military enthusiasts and general readers. Sauer's first-hand experience lends authenticity and depth to the narrative, as he combines technical details with vivid descriptions of the battle's environment and the emotions of those involved.

Criticism

While Sauer’s detailed account provides an in-depth look at the Battle of Leyte Gulf, some readers might find the extensive focus on tactical details overwhelming if they lack a background in naval history. Furthermore, the book's concentration on the Surigao Strait might leave those looking for a broader overview of the entire battle feeling slightly unfulfilled. However, these aspects do not significantly detract from the book's overall contribution to historical naval literature.