The US Marine Corps in the Vietnam War

Brief Summary

The US Marine Corps in the Vietnam War by Ed Gilbert provides an in-depth analysis of the III Marine Amphibious Force (III MAF) and its evolution during the Vietnam War. Initially envisioned as a small division command, it expanded into a formidable force involving two divisions, an air wing, and a Force Logistics Command. The book delves into the unique organizational structure of III MAF, which combined combat and logistical operations under one command, and explores its strategic engagements against the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces.

Main Themes and Topics

One of the central themes of the book is the adaptability and expansion of the Marine Corps' organizational structure throughout the Vietnam War. Ed Gilbert discusses how the III MAF evolved to meet the changing demands of warfare, providing a comprehensive overview of both the operational and logistical challenges faced by the Marines. Another key topic is the operational execution against guerrilla warfare from the Viet Cong and conventional tactics by the North Vietnamese Army, highlighting the complexity and intensity of the Marine Corps' engagements in the conflict.

Writing Style and Tone

Ed Gilbert's writing style is characterized by a detailed and factual approach, focusing heavily on the military and operational aspects of the Marine Corps' role in Vietnam. The tone is largely analytical and informative, aiming to provide a clear understanding of the evolving strategies and organizational adaptations. The use of maps and organizational charts helps to illustrate the complex structure and operations of the III MAF, enhancing the reader's comprehension of the challenges faced during their deployment.

Criticism

While the book offers a thorough examination of the III MAF's role in Vietnam, some readers might find the heavy focus on military structure and logistics to be somewhat dry or overly technical. Those seeking personal narratives or broader socio-political insights into the Vietnam War might feel that the book lacks a wider contextual perspective, focusing predominantly on the operational aspects and less on the personal experiences of those involved.