America's Road to Jerusalem

Brief Summary

America's Road to Jerusalem by Jason M. Olson delves into the intricate relationship between American Protestant politics and culture through the lens of the pivotal Six-Day War. The book posits that this conflict significantly altered the power dynamics within American Protestantism, influencing the political landscape in profound ways. Olson effectively ties these historical shifts to contemporary events, notably the Trump Administration's 2017 recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital, underscoring the enduring impact of religious and political intersections.

Main Themes and Topics

The primary theme of America's Road to Jerusalem centers on the tectonic shifts within American Protestantism during and after the Six-Day War. Key topics include the clash between Evangelicals and Modernists, which Olson asserts led to a reconfiguration of political allegiances and ideological priorities. This period marked a turning point where Evangelical influence grew significantly, setting the stage for future American political decisions regarding Israel. The examination of religious narratives and their mobilization in political discourse is another crucial topic explored in the book.

Writing Style and Tone

Jason M. Olson employs a scholarly yet accessible writing style in America's Road to Jerusalem. His tone is analytical, with a clear focus on presenting historical data and interpretations in a balanced manner. Olson combines meticulous research with engaging storytelling, making complex political and religious developments understandable for both scholars and general readers. His approach encourages readers to critically engage with the material, offering a thorough examination of the cultural and political shifts that have shaped contemporary American attitudes towards Israel.

Criticism

While America's Road to Jerusalem has been praised for its comprehensive analysis and insightful connections, some critics have noted that the book could benefit from a broader perspective that includes additional voices from diverse religious traditions. This feedback suggests that while Olson provides a thorough account of Protestant dynamics, incorporating other viewpoints could enhance the book's depth and offer a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between religion and politics.