Becoming Enemies

Brief Summary

Becoming Enemies by James G. Blight is an insightful exploration into the complex U.S. and Iranian relations from 1978, marking the fall of the Shah, through the Iranian hostage crisis and the Iran-Iraq war. Utilizing the innovative methods of critical oral history, this book delves into the critical moments of diplomatic tensions, providing a fresh perspective on historical events. The book emphasizes the U.S. role in the Iran-Iraq War, using declassified documents and oral testimonies to shed light on previously unknown aspects of U.S. policymaking during that era.

Main Themes and Topics

One of the prominent themes in Becoming Enemies is the examination of U.S. foreign policy strategies in the Middle East during a tumultuous period. The book highlights the intricacies of diplomatic relationships, focusing on the reasons behind various foreign policy decisions, particularly during the Iran-Iraq War. It also scrutinizes the role of declassified documentation and oral testimonies that provide critical insights into these diplomatic decisions. Another significant theme is the impact of historical events on present-day foreign policy challenges, offering lessons that go beyond the specific context of the book.

Writing Style and Tone

James G. Blight employs a scholarly yet accessible writing style in Becoming Enemies. The tone is analytical, suited for both academia and readers interested in historical and political studies. The use of critical oral history methods allows for a multi-perspective approach, integrating testimonies from former officials and scholars. This method enriches the narrative by providing a nuanced view of historical events, making complex geopolitical topics more relatable and understandable for the reader.

Criticism

While Becoming Enemies has been praised for its detailed research and innovative approach, some critics note that the book's focus on declassified materials and oral histories might overshadow other potentially significant sources or perspectives. Additionally, the depth of analysis may sometimes prove challenging for readers who are not well-versed in Middle Eastern history or U.S. foreign policy.