Standard Operating Procedure

Brief Summary

Standard Operating Procedure by Philip Gourevitch provides an in-depth examination of the events at Abu Ghraib prison, bringing to light the complex layers behind the widely publicized images of prisoner abuse. The book is a detailed narrative that incorporates insights from extensive interviews with military personnel and other individuals involved in the incident. It serves as a revealing account of the contradictions and moral dilemmas faced by those stationed at the prison.

Main Themes and Topics

The central themes of Standard Operating Procedure revolve around the ethical, moral, and political implications of war, particularly focusing on the dehumanizing effects of conflict and the complicated nature of military authority. It explores the systemic failures that contributed to the environment at Abu Ghraib, highlighting the blurred lines between orders and personal moral agency. The book delves into the psychology of individuals in power and the institutional structures that can lead to human rights violations.

Writing Style and Tone

Philip Gourevitch, known for his meticulous storytelling and insightful analysis, presents Standard Operating Procedure with a narrative style that is both engaging and thought-provoking. His tone throughout the book is investigative and clear-eyed, seeking to unravel the truth without sensationalism. Gourevitch's background in journalism is evident in the careful documentation and the way he allows the voices of those involved to emerge clearly and authentically.

Awards and Recognition

The book gained significant attention upon release, appreciated for its thorough investigative approach and the moral questions it poses. It is recognized for contributing to the conversation about accountability and justice in military operations. While specific awards for this book are not detailed here, Gourevitch himself is a celebrated writer, previously acknowledged for his work in the field of nonfiction.

Criticism

While Standard Operating Procedure received praise for its detailed reporting and narrative depth, some critics argue that the book might be challenging for readers due to its intense subject matter and the complex ethical questions it raises. Others suggest that the book could have further explored the broader systemic political issues contributing to such events. Despite this, the book is largely seen as a crucial account that challenges readers to confront uncomfortable truths about war and power.