
The Battle for Jerusalem
by Mordekhai Gur
Popularity
0.63 / 5
* A book's popularity is determined by how it compares to all other books on this website.
Where to buy?
Buy from Amazon* If you buy this book through the link above, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.
The Battle for Jerusalem by Mordekhai Gur
Details
War:
Six-Day War
Perspective:
Commanders
Biography:
No
Region:
Middle East
Page Count:
388
Published Date:
1978
ISBN13:
9780445043268
Description
Brief Summary
The Battle for Jerusalem by Mordekhai Gur provides a detailed account of the decisive military strategy and operations leading to the capture of Jerusalem during the Six-Day War in 1967. As Gur himself was a key figure in the battle, the book conveys an insider's perspective, offering readers a chance to engage with the events from an authoritative viewpoint. Although the narrative is steeped in military history, it also captures the emotional weight and historical significance of reuniting Jerusalem.
Main Themes and Topics
One of the central themes of The Battle for Jerusalem is the strategic significance of the city and the complex geopolitical landscape surrounding the Six-Day War. Gur explores the military tactics employed during the battle, emphasizing coordination, leadership, and the element of surprise. The book also delves into themes of perseverance and the determination of the Israeli forces, underscoring the emotional resonance of reclaiming a city with deep historical and cultural roots.
Writing Style and Tone
Mordekhai Gur's writing style in The Battle for Jerusalem is methodical and precise, reflecting his background as a military leader. His tone is authoritative, borne from firsthand experience, and he structures the narrative to provide both a coherent chronological account and insightful analysis of the tactics used. The prose balances technical military descriptions with heartfelt recollections, offering a narrative that is both informative and engaging.
Criticism
Some readers have noted that while the book provides a comprehensive military account, it occasionally lacks broader political context. This focus, while providing depth in military tactics and individual experiences, may not satisfy readers seeking a wider analysis of the geopolitical ramifications of the battle. Additionally, the detailed military jargon, while appropriate for the subject, can be challenging for those unfamiliar with the terminology.