The Yankees are Coming! The Yankees are Coming!

Brief Summary

The Yankees are Coming! The Yankees are Coming! by Major Jeffrey M. Dunn USMC offers a compelling analysis of two distinct periods in history: the American Revolution and the Vietnam War. This paper delves into the uncanny similarities between the British involvement in America’s fight for independence and the United States' engagement in North Vietnam’s quest for unification. Major Dunn meticulously examines five key parallels: flawed assumptions, lengthy lines of communication, similarities in the people involved, pivotal campaigns serving as turning points, and analogous southern strategies. Through this exploration, the author highlights how historical patterns can serve as valuable lessons for future success, specifically for the United States.

Main Themes and Topics

The central theme of the book is the exploration of historical parallels and the lessons they present for contemporary military and political strategy. Major Dunn emphasizes the importance of recognizing repetitive patterns in history, particularly through a detailed comparison of two notable conflicts: the American Revolution and the Vietnam War. The book argues that both Britain and the United States encountered similar challenges that were crucial in shaping the outcomes of their respective conflicts. Themes such as the flaw of assumptions, geographic and communicative challenges, and the impact of strategic military campaigns are prevalent throughout the analysis.

Writing Style and Tone

Major Jeffrey M. Dunn employs a scholarly and analytical writing style that is suitable for the book's academic intent. His tone is informative and objective, aiming to provide a clear and thorough comparative study of the two conflicts without bias. The writing is well-organized and methodical, which aids readers in understanding the complexities of the parallel historical events. The clarity in his arguments and the logical structure make this work accessible to both military historians and general readers interested in historical analysis.

Criticism

One possible criticism of the book could be its intense focus on military strategy and patterns, which might not cater to readers looking for a broader historical context or a more diverse range of perspectives. While the book’s comparative approach is insightful, the emphasis on military parallels limits the exploration of social, cultural, or political dimensions of the conflicts. This narrow scope might leave readers seeking a more holistic understanding somewhat dissatisfied.