To End a War

Brief Summary

To End a War by Richard Holbrooke is the gripping inside account of the United States' diplomatic efforts to bring peace to Bosnia in the mid-1990s. Tasked by President Clinton, Holbrooke recounts the challenges and strategies employed in the face of skepticism and resistance from various quarters. This account unfolds against the backdrop of Europe's most devastating conflict since World War II and underscores the complex interplay of diplomacy, leadership, and military might required to end the war. Holbrooke's narrative provides sharp insights into the personalities and politics that defined this crucial period and the subsequent implementation of the Dayton Agreement.

Main Themes and Topics

The book explores several critical themes, including the intricacies of international diplomacy, the role of American leadership in global conflicts, and the moral and strategic imperatives that drive intervention. Holbrooke delves into the notion of American power and its uses, elucidating how a blend of negotiation tactics, forceful persuasion, and a willingness to apply military force when necessary were pivotal in achieving peace. The narrative also highlights the personal and political challenges faced by negotiators working in high-pressure environments where the stakes could not be higher.

Writing Style and Tone

Holbrooke's writing style is direct and engaging, reflecting both his diplomatic acumen and ability to tell a compelling story. The tone of the book is reflective, candid, and, at times, unforgiving, especially when portraying the key figures involved in the negotiation process. Holbrooke's account is rich in detail, offering readers an unvarnished look at the high-stakes world of international diplomacy. This detailed approach serves to immerse the reader in the challenges and triumphs experienced during the peace negotiations.

Criticism

While To End a War is praised for its detailed and insightful account of the Bosnian peace process, some critics have noted that Holbrooke's perspective is very much that of an American diplomat, which may not fully encompass the complexities and viewpoints of all parties involved in the conflict. Others have pointed out that the book sometimes valorizes the role of American intervention without adequately addressing the nuanced geopolitical considerations it entailed.