A Politician Turned General

Brief Summary

"A Politician Turned General" by Jeffrey Norman Lash delves into the intriguing life of Stephen Augustus Hurlbut, an Illinois Whig and Republican politician who played a significant role as a Union general during the American Civil War. This biography is an insightful exploration of Hurlbut's transformation from a political figure to a military commander, capturing his controversial military service and highlighting his rise within the Union high command in the West. With a deep dive into his connections to Abraham Lincoln and an analysis of his performance in key battles, Lash offers a comprehensive portrayal of Hurlbut's career and the era he influenced.

Main Themes and Topics

The book intricately weaves themes of political power and military influence during the Civil War period. It scrutinizes the complex interplay between Hurlbut's political aspirations and military obligations, providing a lens through which the reader can understand the broader context of political generals like him. Lash dissects Hurlbut’s dual identity as a "military politician," offering insights into how his allegiance and proximity to Lincoln helped shape his career. Through an examination of pivotal battles and leadership decisions, the book also addresses the themes of loyalty, ambition, and the tumultuous nature of war-time politics.

Writing Style and Tone

Jeffrey Norman Lash employs a scholarly tone throughout "A Politician Turned General," reflecting thorough research and an academic approach to the historical subject matter. The writing is meticulous, with detailed footnotes and references that enhance the reader's understanding of Hurlbut’s impact and contributions. Lash's narrative is both informative and engaging, striking a balance between historical exposition and insightful analysis. The tone maintains objectivity, as Lash explores both the commendable aspects and the contentious decisions of Hurlbut’s military career.

Criticism

While "A Politician Turned General" is comprehensive, some readers might find the level of detail overwhelming, particularly those less familiar with Civil War history or the intricacies of 19th-century American politics. The book’s academic focus and dense historical context may not appeal to a casual audience seeking a light biography. Critics have also pointed out that the heavy emphasis on primary and secondary sources, although a strength in scholarly rigor, can occasionally result in a narrative that feels more like a historical catalogue than a fluid biography.