Creating the Modern Army

Brief Summary

Creating the Modern Army by William J. Woolley presents a detailed exploration of the transformation of the United States Army during the interwar period, between World War I and World War II. Woolley contends that this transformation was not a byproduct of random developments but rather a structured enterprise rooted in the National Defense Act of 1920. This act provided a blueprint that guided the modernization efforts, leading to the establishment of various civilian components within the army including the Citizen's Military Training Camps, the Officer Reserve Corps, and more. The book highlights how the army's transformation included the reorganization of its branches, the introduction of a professional military education system, and the beginning stages of mechanization in combat branches.

Main Themes and Topics

One of the central themes of the book is the significance of deliberate policy-making for the successful modernization of military forces. Woolley emphasizes the importance of the National Defense Act of 1920 as a fundamental document that shaped the army's transformation. He explores how the act laid the groundwork for developing civilian components like the National Guard and Reserve Officer Training Corps, which were integral to creating a new army structure. Additionally, the book discusses the development of professional military education and mechanization, which were vital in adapting the army to new global military challenges.

Writing Style and Tone

Woolley's writing is characterized by its scholarly tone, making use of in-depth research and comprehensive analysis to build his arguments. The style is formal yet accessible, suitable for both academic audiences and general readers interested in military history. Woolley adopts an analytical approach, meticulously dissecting legislative acts, military policies, and their implementation to demonstrate the systematic evolution of the army during the interwar period.

Criticism

While Creating the Modern Army is widely praised for its thorough research and insightful analysis, some readers may find the book's dense academic style challenging. The focus on legislative and bureaucratic processes requires a strong interest in military history and policy. Critics have occasionally pointed out that the heavy focus on detailed documentation might overwhelm readers who are expecting a narrative-driven history.