Deceit on the Road to War

Brief Summary

Deceit on the Road to War by John M. Schuessler investigates the pattern of deceit by U.S. presidents in the context of decisions regarding war and peace. Schuessler argues that deception is often a deliberate strategy used by presidents to manipulate public opinion and garner support for military actions. The book examines three case studies — Franklin Roosevelt and World War II, Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam War, and George W. Bush and the Iraq War — to illustrate how leaders have misled the public to serve their objectives. These strategies include framing issues misleadingly, suppressing damaging information, and overselling the benefits of going to war. Schuessler concludes that such tactics are made possible by the democratic system itself, as leaders in democracies retain the capability to manipulate domestic audiences prior to conflicts when the information disparity between government and the public is greatest.

Main Themes and Topics

The central theme of this book is the relationship between democracy and deception, particularly in the context of war. Schuessler explores how deception is not just a tactical maneuver but a strategic choice driven by the democratic need for public support. The exploration of case studies—Roosevelt, Johnson, and Bush—allows Schuessler to demonstrate the repetitive nature of this deceit across different historical contexts and conflicts. Another important topic is the dissection of communication tactics used by leaders, which include propaganda and selective dissemination of information to misguide public perception.

Writing Style and Tone

John M. Schuessler employs an analytical and scholarly tone throughout the book. The writing is structured and deeply rooted in political science theories, making complex concepts accessible to readers with a keen interest in history and political strategy. The cases are methodically presented, allowing the reader to easily follow the arguments and evidence that Schuessler articulates. His style is straightforward yet engaging, successfully weaving historical facts with theoretical insights.

Criticism

Some readers may find Schuessler's focus predominantly on U.S. presidents somewhat limited, potentially overlooking similar patterns of deception in other democratic nations. Additionally, while the book is well-researched, its emphasis on presidential deceit might be viewed as a narrow lens through which to see the multifaceted nature of political decision-making in times of war. Critics may also argue that Schuessler’s conclusions could benefit from a broader analysis involving a wider array of democratic contexts outside the U.S.