
Foxholes & Color Lines
by Sherie Mershon
"Desegregating the U.S. Armed Forces"
Popularity
2.28 / 5
* A book's popularity is determined by how it compares to all other books on this website.
Where to buy?
Buy from Amazon* If you buy this book through the link above, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Foxholes & Color Lines by Sherie Mershon
Details
War:
World War II
Perspective:
Commanders
Military Unit:
US Army
True Story:
Yes
Biography:
No
Region:
North America
Page Count:
440
Published Date:
1998
ISBN13:
9780801856907
Description
Brief Summary
Foxholes & Color Lines by Sherie Mershon examines the slow and challenging journey toward racial integration within the U.S. armed services. Through well-researched historical accounts and analysis, Mershon highlights the resistance from military establishments and the complex social dynamics that obstructed progress, despite the pressure from civilian leadership to implement such policies.
Main Themes and Topics
The central themes of Foxholes & Color Lines revolve around racial integration, military policy, and the intricate interplay between civilian governance and military tradition. Mershon delves into the systemic racism prevalent in military institutions and explores the reasons behind the protracted opposition to racial equality within the armed forces. The book also critiques the disconnect between political directives and military practice, providing an insightful context for understanding the socio-political climate of the time.
Writing Style and Tone
Sherie Mershon writes with a thoughtful and incisive style that makes a complex historical subject accessible to readers. Her tone is analytical yet empathetic, balancing meticulous research with a narrative that engages the reader. This approach not only educates but also evokes a deeper understanding of the human elements involved in the struggle for racial equality in the military context.
Criticism
While Foxholes & Color Lines has been praised for its thorough research and insightful analysis, some critics have noted that it can be dense in sections, particularly when detailing military bureaucratic processes. This level of detail, although essential for the depth of the study, may challenge readers who are less familiar with military history or policy-making. Nonetheless, the book's contribution to the discourse on race and military integration is undeniably significant.