Graves & Sassoon

Brief Summary

Graves & Sassoon by Helen McPhail is a compelling literary exploration of the war memoirs penned by two renowned officers of the Royal Welsh Fusiliers, Robert Graves and Siegfried Sassoon. These memoirs, which have remained in print since their initial release, offer distinct perspectives on war and its aftermath. While Graves' accounts are known for their controversial inaccuracies and critiques of the British Army, Sassoon's writings offer a nostalgic reflection on his past, interwoven with vivid descriptions of the key battles such as the Battle of the Somme and the Battle of Arras. McPhail's book serves not only as a detailed commentary on these writings but also as a lens through which to view the broader cultural and poetic impact of both authors on the perception of war.

Main Themes and Topics

The book delves into several significant themes, primarily focusing on the contrasting styles and narratives of Graves and Sassoon. It explores themes of memory, historical accuracy, and the personal vs. collective experience of war. The differing approaches of the two authors in recounting their war experiences highlight diverging aspects of identity, loyalty, and the subjective nature of truth in memoir writing. In dissecting these themes, McPhail reveals how both authors, despite their different styles, helped shape the public’s understanding and artistic expression of war.

Writing Style and Tone

Helen McPhail's writing is both analytical and engaging, providing an insightful critique while maintaining accessibility for a wide readership. Her tone balances scholarly analysis with a narrative style that helps contextualize and illuminate the writings of Graves and Sassoon. McPhail’s careful dissection of their stylistic differences and their cultural ramifications demonstrates her deep understanding of literary critique, making the book an informative and enjoyable read.

Criticism

While Graves & Sassoon offers a detailed examination of its subjects, it has been noted that some readers might find the focus on historical inaccuracies and controversies surrounding Graves as overly emphasized at times. This emphasis, while pivotal to understanding Graves’ contribution, may overshadow some of the broader thematic elements that also merit attention. Nevertheless, this focus does underscore an essential aspect of Graves’ legacy, making it a vital component of the discussion.