Journal of the Waterloo Campaign (kept throughout the campaign of 1815)

Brief Summary

Journal of the Waterloo Campaign (kept throughout the campaign of 1815) by General Alexander Cavalié Mercer is a captivating firsthand account of the Waterloo Campaign. The book is derived from the journal Mercer kept during his time in charge of "G" troop of the Royal Horse Artillery (RHA). It offers an insightful perspective on the events leading up to and during the Battle of Waterloo. Mercer's detailed observations and personal anecdotes bring to life the chaotic and dramatic circumstances faced by the Allied forces. The book captures Mercer's experiences from his arrival in Belgium, through the battles of Quatre Bras and Waterloo, to the aftermath and pursuit of the retreating French forces.

Main Themes and Topics

The book delves into key themes such as the chaos of war, the challenges of leadership, and the complexity of military strategy. Mercer provides an in-depth look at the dynamics of the Allied forces and the tension of anticipation before the battle. Additionally, the book explores the intricacies of artillery warfare and the emotional toll on soldiers during the campaign. There is also a critical view of rank and custom, as Mercer discusses the social interactions and morale of troops, as well as the enthusiasm of Belgian locals towards the conflict.

Writing Style and Tone

Mercer's writing style in the journal is notably lively, with a jaunty air that is reminiscent of the memoirs of French cavalry officers. His tone is often irreverent, especially when discussing rank and custom. Despite the seriousness of the subject, Mercer's account is filled with vivid descriptions and a keen eye for detail, making it both informative and engaging. His depiction of key figures, such as the Duc de Berri, is particularly cutting, and his narrative often brings a sense of immediacy and presence to the reader.

Criticism

While the book is undoubtedly a significant historical document, some readers may find Mercer's irreverent tone at odds with the gravity of the events described. Additionally, his detailed focus on artillery operations might be overwhelming for those less interested in military tactics. However, these aspects also contribute to the richness of the account, offering a unique perspective on the campaign.