Of Duty Well and Faithfully Done

Brief Summary

Of Duty Well and Faithfully Done by Clayton R. Newell provides an in-depth examination of the Regular Army of the United States during the Civil War era. The book highlights the organizational challenges faced by the Regular Army, which was small and unprepared at the war's outset, and details its significant expansion and transformation throughout the conflict. Despite being overshadowed by the larger army of state volunteers, the Regular Army's pivotal roles in leadership and logistical operations are thoroughly explored. This comprehensive study offers valuable insights into how the institution evolved and played a critical part in shaping post-war military structure.

Main Themes and Topics

The book predominantly focuses on the organizational evolution of the Regular Army during the Civil War. Key themes include leadership development, administrative challenges, and strategic logistics, which were vital for managing the Union Army's operations. Newell also explores the dynamic between the Regular Army and the volunteer forces, emphasizing how the Regulars provided essential training and leadership that influenced the volunteers' effectiveness in combat. Additionally, the book assesses the impact of the war on the restructuring of the military and its long-term implications for the United States Army.

Writing Style and Tone

Clayton R. Newell employs a detailed and scholarly writing style, suitable for readers with a keen interest in military history. The tone is informative and analytical, providing a clear and methodical examination of historical data and events. Newell's ability to convey complex military structures and strategies in an accessible manner ensures the book is both educational and engaging.

Awards and Recognition

This work benefits from the esteemed insight of Edward M. Coffman, an award-winning military historian who provides the foreword. While specific awards for this book are not mentioned, the involvement of well-regarded figures in military history underscores its scholarly merit and the high regard in which it is held within the academic community.

Criticism

Some critics may point out that while the book provides a comprehensive look at the Regular Army's organizational history, it may not delve deeply enough into the personal experiences of individual soldiers. By focusing predominantly on institutional changes, the narrative can seem less personal and more technical, which might not cater to readers seeking a more humanized account of the war.