Revolt on the Tigris

Brief Summary

Revolt on the Tigris by Mark Etherington provides an intense, firsthand account of his experience as the governor of Wasit Province in southern Iraq during the tumultuous period of post-conflict reconstruction. Etherington, a former British Army paratrooper, was tasked by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) with rebuilding both the political and physical landscapes of the province. The book delves into the challenges he faced, such as widespread poverty, a corrupt police force, and escalating insurgency, particularly from followers of Moqtada al-Sadr. This account paints a vivid picture of the complexities and struggles inherent in nation-building efforts.

Main Themes and Topics

The primary themes of Revolt on the Tigris revolve around reconstruction, governance, and the socio-political dynamics in post-war Iraq. Etherington highlights the complexities of rebuilding a province amidst rampant poverty and political turmoil. The book also addresses the difficulties in establishing the rule of law where local authorities were either ineffectual or corrupt, compounded by the internal and external pressures of insurgency. Furthermore, the cultural and sectarian divides within Wasit Province offer insights into the broader challenges faced by the Coalition in stabilizing Iraq.

Writing Style and Tone

Mark Etherington’s writing style in Revolt on the Tigris is straightforward and candid, reflecting his military background and deep understanding of international relations. The tone is gritty and realistic, offering an honest portrayal of the harsh realities faced on the ground in Iraq. His narrative is enriched with personal anecdotes, which give readers a sense of immediacy and intimacy with the subject matter, making the complexities of the situation more tangible.

Criticism

While Revolt on the Tigris has been commended for its detailed personal account and insights into post-war challenges, some critics have noted that Etherington's perspective is inevitably limited to his experiences and may not fully encapsulate the broader geopolitical factors at play. Additionally, the focus on military and political aspects might overshadow the human dimension of the local population's suffering and resilience during the reconstruction period.