The Future of the Citizen-soldier Force

Brief Summary

The Future of the Citizen-soldier Force by Jeffrey A. Jacobs delves into the critical examination of the U.S. Army's reserve components in the post-Cold War era. Jacobs, with his rich background of having served in the active Army and both the Guard and the Reserve, provides an insightful analysis of the challenges and limitations faced by the reserve forces. The book explores the effectiveness of these components in recent conflicts, such as the Persian Gulf War, and questions their readiness for future combat scenarios. Jacobs identifies the historical and political entanglements that hinder the transformation and efficiency of the reserves, while proposing reforms aimed at integrating these components into a cohesive and responsive Total Army.

Main Themes and Topics

The book primarily addresses the themes of military readiness, structural reform, and the integration of Reserve components into the broader Army framework. Jacobs identifies key deficiencies and limitations within the reserve forces, rooted deeply in tradition and political affiliations, and how these factors impede their operational effectiveness. Furthermore, he emphasizes the need for substantial reforms, such as changing the state control of the National Guard, revising the weekend drill system, and reevaluating the geography-based reserve system. These themes underscore a broader discussion about national defense policies and the strategic role of the reserve forces in maintaining military preparedness.

Writing Style and Tone

Jacobs writes with the authority and insight that stems from his extensive personal experience within various branches of the military. His tone is analytical and forthright, challenging readers to confront uncomfortable truths about the current state of the U.S. Army's reserve components. Despite the complexity of the subject matter, Jacobs presents his arguments in a coherent and accessible manner, making it approachable for both defense policy experts and general readers interested in military affairs.

Criticism

One potential criticism of Jacobs's work could be the controversial nature of his proposed reforms. By suggesting changes that affect established traditions and political structures, such as altering the state control of the National Guard, Jacobs risks alienating traditionalists and those invested in maintaining the status quo. Some readers might find his proposals to be too radical or difficult to implement, considering the entrenched political interests involved.