
Apologies to Thucydides
by Marshall Sahlins
"Understanding History as Culture and Vice Versa"
Popularity
3.45 / 5
* A book's popularity is determined by how it compares to all other books on this website.
Where to buy?
Buy from Amazon* If you buy this book through the link above, we may receive a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Apologies to Thucydides by Marshall Sahlins
Details
Perspective:
Researcher
Biography:
No
Published Date:
2013
ISBN13:
9780226103822
Description
Brief Summary
"Apologies to Thucydides" by Marshall Sahlins offers a thought-provoking reinterpretation of historical analysis through the lens of anthropology. By juxtaposing Thucydides' classic narrative of the Peloponnesian War with a parallel "Polynesian War" in the Fiji Islands, Sahlins challenges the conventional Eurocentric approach to history. He explores how cultural contexts shape historical narratives, emphasizing the roles of both prominent figures and collective groups in historical developments.
Main Themes and Topics
The main theme of "Apologies to Thucydides" centers around the interaction between culture and historical narrative. Sahlins delves deeply into how cultural influences can alter the perception and recording of history, contrasting Thucydides' emphasis on political and military power with an anthropological viewpoint. The book also navigates themes of power dynamics, the influence of "Great Men" versus collective entities in history, and the clash between Western and non-Western historical traditions.
Writing Style and Tone
Sahlins employs a scholarly yet accessible writing style that intertwines narrative with analytical insight. His tone is both engaging and provocative, inviting readers to reconsider established historical narratives. He skillfully balances detailed accounts of historical events with broader cultural analysis, offering a rich and nuanced perspective that is both informative and intellectually stimulating.
Criticism
While "Apologies to Thucydides" has been praised for its innovative approach and depth of analysis, some critics may find the dense academic style challenging. The intricate connections between disparate historical events and figures require careful attention, which might be demanding for readers not well-versed in either history or anthropology. Others might critique the book for its heavy reliance on anthropological theory, which can overshadow the historical narratives at times.









