By His Own Rules

Brief Summary

By His Own Rules by Bradley Graham provides an in-depth biographical account of Donald Rumsfeld, a significant figure in U.S. defense history. Entering 2001 as the Secretary of Defense under President George W. Bush, Rumsfeld was known for his successful careers in politics and business. However, his tenure became mired in controversy, especially concerning his management of the Iraq War and his contentious relationships within Washington. This biography explores whether Rumsfeld was the visionary leader some claim or the overbearing figure critics describe.

Main Themes and Topics

The book delves into several key themes, primarily focused on leadership, decision-making, and legacy. It explores Rumsfeld's complex persona and the duality of his public perception: a capable visionary to some and a flawed leader to others. The book sheds light on the intricacies of Washington politics, the bureaucratic challenges within the Pentagon, and the critical decisions that shaped U.S. national security policy during his tenure. It also provides a layered understanding of the Iraq War and its implications on Rumsfeld's reputation.

Writing Style and Tone

Graham's writing is both rigorous and engaging, characterized by a journalistic precision that benefits from his long-time experience as a Washington Post reporter. The tone is balanced, offering a comprehensive perspective without succumbing to bias, allowing readers to form their own judgments about Rumsfeld's controversial career. The narrative is well-structured, providing both detailed analysis and broader historical context, making it accessible to both general readers and those more acquainted with political histories.

Criticism

While the book is praised for its detailed research and balanced narrative, some critics argue that it occasionally delves too deeply into the minutiae of bureaucratic processes, which might overwhelm readers unfamiliar with the complexities of U.S. defense infrastructure. Additionally, readers seeking a more definitive stance on Rumsfeld's legacy might find the even-handed approach lacking in definitive conclusions.