Call Sign Extortion 17

Brief Summary

Call Sign Extortion 17 by Don Brown delves into the tragic events of August 6, 2011, when a Chinook helicopter, designated as Extortion 17, was shot down in Afghanistan. This incident marked the deadliest day for the United States in the twelve-year conflict, resulting in the loss of 30 American service members, including members of the Navy SEAL Team Six. The book investigates the official military inquiry into the crash, proposing that there was a Taliban conspiracy to avenge Bin Laden's death, which was allegedly covered up in the official reports.

Main Themes and Topics

The book prominently explores themes of military conflict, brotherhood, and sacrifice. It questions the veracity of military investigations and seeks to uncover the truth behind governmental narratives, delving into the implications of transparency and accountability within military operations. Don Brown focuses on the intricacies of combat missions, the strategic importance of Navy SEAL Team Six, and the overarching geopolitical ramifications. Further, it delves into the emotional toll on families and the military community, offering a critique of how sensitive information is handled post-calamity.

Writing Style and Tone

Don Brown's writing style in Call Sign Extortion 17 is investigative and analytical. He approaches the subject matter with a sense of urgency and determination, striving to paint a vivid picture of the tragic event and its aftermath. The tone is often somber, reflecting the gravity of the incident while aiming to honor the memory of the fallen. Brown's background in law adds a forensic quality to his narrative, combining meticulous research with emotive storytelling to engage readers seeking both factual detailing and empathetic perspectives.

Criticism

Critics of Call Sign Extortion 17 have noted that while the book raises important questions about military transparency and accountability, it may occasionally indulge in speculation regarding the motivations behind the official narratives. Some believe that Brown's assertions might rely too heavily on conjecture rather than concrete evidence. Additionally, the book's strong stance might appear politicized to readers expecting a more detached journalistic approach.