Closing with the Enemy

Brief Summary

Closing with the Enemy by Michael D. Doubler explores the critical period from the aftermath of D-Day to the end of the Battle of the Bulge during World War II. The book examines how American GIs successfully engaged in and won battles against the German Army, taking and holding territory through adaptability and innovation on the battlefield. Doubler challenges previous historical accounts by portraying American forces as more competent and effective than previously acknowledged. He argues that the GIs' quick learning, strategic adaptability, and innovative tactics were pivotal in overcoming a well-trained and heavily fortified enemy.

Main Themes and Topics

One of the main themes of Closing with the Enemy is the emphasis on the adaptability and innovation of American troops during World War II. Doubler highlights that while the GIs may not have been fully prepared initially, their ability to learn quickly from mistakes and adapt tactically was crucial to their success. The book underscores the significance of combined arms warfare, showcasing the coordinated use of infantry, tanks, artillery, air power, and engineers. These themes emphasize not just the technical aspects of warfare but also the democratic and entrepreneurial spirit driving the innovations that emerged at every level within the ranks.

Writing Style and Tone

Doubler's writing style in Closing with the Enemy is analytical and engaging, balancing detailed military analysis with broader thematic discussions. His tone is assertive, as he presents a revisionist view that challenges previous historians' interpretations of the American military effectiveness during World War II. The narrative effectively combines historical reassessment with vivid descriptions of the battles and strategies, making it accessible to both military historians and general readers interested in World War II.

Criticism

While Michael D. Doubler's work has been praised for its thorough research and fresh perspective on American military efforts in World War II, some critics argue that the book could have provided more extensive views from the German side to offer a balanced comparison. Nonetheless, the book's emphasis on American innovation and adaptability remains a significant contribution to World War II historiography, even if some feel it could delve deeper into contrasting perspectives.