Jubal Early

Brief Summary

In "Jubal Early: Robert E. Lee’s Bad Old Man," author Benjamin Franklin Cooling presents a critical biography of the Confederate Lieutenant General Jubal Anderson Early. Known for his fierce demeanor and dubbed Lee's "bad old man," Early played a crucial role during the Civil War, particularly in the 1864 Valley Campaign. Cooling offers a detailed exploration of Early's military exploits, his near-miss at capturing Washington, and his role in destructive warfare. The book examines the paradox of Early's character—a devoted Unionist turned Confederate hero and later an emblem of the "lost cause" narrative.

Main Themes and Topics

The book delves into several major themes, notably the transformation of Jubal Early from a steadfast prewar constitutional unionist to an aggressive proponent of Confederate causes and ideologies. It highlights Early's role as a primary practitioner of destructive warfare among the Confederate generals, shedding light on his tactics of extorting northern towns and his association with notorious acts such as the destruction of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania. The text also examines how Early's personal foibles and strategic decisions influenced the outcomes of his military initiatives, revealing the complexity of his character and legacy. The debate between individual flaws and external factors in his failures adds depth to the narrative.

Writing Style and Tone

Cooling employs a scholarly and analytical writing style, presenting a thorough and insightful examination of Jubal Early's life and military career. The tone is critical yet balanced, providing a nuanced portrait that neither fully vilifies nor glorifies its subject. The author combines meticulous research with an engaging narrative, making complex historical events accessible to readers with varying levels of familiarity with Civil War history.

Criticism

While "Jubal Early: Robert E. Lee’s Bad Old Man" offers a comprehensive analysis of Early’s military and personal life, some readers may find the text's dense historical detail challenging. The book's focus on Early's negative attributes and failures might overshadow his strategic contributions, potentially skewing the reader’s perception. However, these criticisms are a testament to the author's commitment to presenting a well-rounded and critical biography.