The Airborne in World War II

Brief Summary

The Airborne in World War II by Michael E. Haskew is a comprehensive account that chronicles the pivotal role of US Airborne divisions throughout World War II. The book takes the reader on a journey from the first combat operations in North Africa, through the grueling campaigns in Italy, and onto the historic events of D-Day, Operation Market Garden, and the Battle of the Bulge, eventually concluding with missions in the Pacific. It blends historical analysis with personal narratives to provide a detailed depiction of the strategic significance and human experiences within these elite units.

Main Themes and Topics

The book delves deeply into the structure and tactics of Airborne divisions, highlighting their strategic importance during critical operations. It discusses the evolution of these forces, beginning with the redesignation of the 82nd division in 1942, and explores how their unique capabilities were leveraged in various theaters of war. Haskew provides insights into the equipment, division structure, and the training regimes that shaped these soldiers into a formidable fighting force. Additionally, the book features first-hand accounts, offering a human perspective on the pressures and challenges faced by paratroopers.

Writing Style and Tone

Michael E. Haskew adopts an accessible and engaging writing style that caters to both history enthusiasts and general readers. The narrative is well-structured, with detailed descriptions that vividly portray the experiences of airborne soldiers. Haskew balances technical military analysis with storytelling, ensuring that the book is not only informative but also compelling. The inclusion of photographs, maps, and illustrations further enriches the reading experience, providing visual context to the historical events discussed.

Criticism

While the book is comprehensive, some readers might find the detailed military analysis and the heavy focus on operational specifics overwhelming, particularly those unfamiliar with military jargon or organizational hierarchy. Additionally, while the personal accounts add depth, their integration sometimes disrupts the narrative flow, potentially hindering a cohesive understanding of the broader historical context. However, these are minor critiques in an otherwise well-researched and engaging work.