The Man Who Would Not Be Washington

The Man Who Would Not Be Washington

by Jonathan Horn

"Robert E. Lee's Civil War and His Decision That Changed American History"

Popularity

4.84 / 5

* A book's popularity is determined by how it compares to all other books on this website.

Details

War:

American Civil War

Perspective:

Commanders

True Story:

Yes

Biography:

Yes

Region:

North America

Page Count:

384

Published Date:

2015

ISBN13:

9781476748566

Description

Brief Summary

The Man Who Would Not Be Washington by Jonathan Horn is a compelling exploration of the life of Robert E. Lee, a figure forever tied to the American Civil War. Horn, a former White House speechwriter, delves into the complexities surrounding Lee, particularly his decision to side with the Confederacy despite his enduring admiration for George Washington. The book examines how Lee, a man linked by marriage and heritage to Washington, ultimately chose to fight against the union Washington helped establish.

Main Themes and Topics

One of the central themes of the book is the concept of legacy and idolization. Horn probes how Washington's legacy both inspired and haunted Lee, influencing his decisions in profound ways. The theme of conflicting loyalties is also prominent, highlighting Lee's internal struggles between his devotion to his native Virginia and his sworn allegiance to the United States. Additionally, the book addresses themes of honor, duty, and the personal conflicts that arise from ideological divides during wartime.

Writing Style and Tone

Jonathan Horn's writing style is both engaging and accessible, offering a detailed and nuanced portrait of Robert E. Lee while maintaining narrative momentum. Horn's background as a speechwriter shines through in his eloquent prose and the way he builds a compelling narrative arc. The tone of the book is reflective, offering both historical analysis and a humanizing perspective on Lee as a man caught in the turbulence of his time.

Criticism

One of the criticisms directed at Horn's work is that it occasionally appears to struggle in balancing its portrayal of Lee as both a historical icon and a complex individual. Some readers may feel that the book at times romanticizes or rationalizes Lee's actions. Nevertheless, this is a common challenge in historical biographies, especially involving such polarizing figures.

Similar Books