The Memoirs of Field-Marshal Wilhelm Keitel

Brief Summary

The Memoirs of Field-Marshal Wilhelm Keitel by Walter Gorlitz offers a unique insider perspective on some of the major military campaigns of World War II, including the blitzkrieg against Poland, the conquest of France, and the campaign against the Soviet Union. Written in the six weeks before Keitel's execution at the Nuremberg Trials for war crimes, this memoir provides readers with a compelling first-hand account of significant historical events, particularly detailing the final eighteen days of the Third Reich.

Main Themes and Topics

One of the prominent themes in Keitel's memoirs is the complexity of military hierarchy and command during wartime. The book delves into the decision-making processes and the pressures faced by military leaders. It highlights the strategic considerations and operational challenges encountered during key military campaigns. Additionally, Keitel's reflections offer insights into his personal justifications and rationalizations for the actions taken by the Nazi regime, which provoke critical thought regarding moral responsibility and obedience to orders in the context of wartime leadership.

Writing Style and Tone

Walter Gorlitz presents Keitel's memoirs in a straightforward and succinct manner, capturing the urgency with which these recollections were penned. The tone is reflective yet matter-of-fact, providing a stark account of the events from Keitel's perspective. The memoirs are structured in a chronological fashion, allowing readers to follow the progression of World War II from the field marshal's viewpoint. Although technical and detailed at times, the narrative remains accessible to readers with an interest in military history.

Criticism

While the memoir provides an invaluable historical account, critics have pointed out the inherent biases present due to Keitel's position and involvement in the Nazi regime. Some readers have questioned the objectivity of his recollections, as they are likely colored by his personal experiences and motivations. Additionally, there is criticism regarding the lack of introspection or remorse for the atrocities committed under his leadership, which may leave readers questioning the ethical implications of his actions and justifications.